String theory is revolutionizing our understanding of the universe by proposing a fundamental shift in perspective. Instead of viewing matter and forces as distinct particles, string theory posits that everything is composed of a single element: minuscule, vibrating strings. These strings, far smaller than atoms, electrons, or quarks, oscillate and contort in intricate ways, giving rise to what we perceive as particles and forces.
Jump to:
String theory stands as a leading concept in theoretical physics, suggesting that reality at its most fundamental level is built from infinitesimally small vibrating strings. These strings, through their vibrations, twists, and folds in multiple, compact dimensions, create the effects we interpret as everything from the particles described in physics to the large-scale phenomena governed by gravity.
Often hailed as a potential “theory of everything,” string theory aims to unify general relativity and quantum mechanics, the two pillars of modern physics. General relativity excels at describing gravity and the large-scale universe, while quantum mechanics governs the realm of the very small. However, these two theories are fundamentally incompatible. String theory emerged as a promising candidate to bridge this gap, potentially solving one of the most significant unresolved issues in physics.
Despite gaining significant traction in the late 1960s and 70s, string theory’s popularity among physicists has seen fluctuations, as noted by John Schwarz of Caltech, a pioneer in the field. Despite extensive research and numerous publications, the groundbreaking breakthrough once anticipated seems more distant today.
Nevertheless, the intellectual journey spurred by string theory has profoundly impacted both physics and mathematics. Regardless of differing opinions within the scientific community, string theory remains a vital and influential area of study.
String Theory FAQs Answered by an Expert
To further clarify string theory, we consulted Nick Geiser, a theoretical physicist from UCLA, to answer some frequently asked questions.
Nick Geiser
Nick Geiser is a PhD candidate in theoretical physics at UCLA and a future Leinweber and Van Loo Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Michigan. His research focuses on scattering amplitudes within high-energy physics. Scattering amplitudes are crucial for experimental measurements and reveal connections between physics and mathematics. Beyond academia, Geiser is dedicated to supporting underrepresented groups in STEM.
What exactly is string theory?
String theory is a theoretical framework where the most basic components of nature are not point-like particles, such as electrons, but rather tiny strings. Imagine incredibly small, vibrating rubber bands.
Primarily, string theory is a theory of quantum gravity, ingeniously merging gravity with quantum mechanics. The quest for a quantum theory of gravity has occupied physicists for nearly a century. Furthermore, string theory concepts have proven valuable in solving complex problems in mathematics and other areas of theoretical physics.
In essence, string theory serves as a versatile language for theoretical physicists, enabling them to tackle challenging problems and explore the mathematical underpinnings of the universe.
Who is credited with inventing string theory?
String theory’s origin is quite serendipitous! In 1969, Gabriele Veneziano, an Italian physicist, formulated an equation, the Veneziano amplitude, to describe the scattering of four strings. Interestingly, Veneziano was initially aiming to describe the interactions of particles like protons and neutrons, not strings themselves. Over the following years, physicists globally began to develop string theory from this initial equation.
The comprehensive picture of string theory has gradually emerged over the past fifty years, marked by significant bursts of innovation and profound insights in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. String theory remains a vibrant field of research with a global community of thousands of scientists.
Is there experimental proof for string theory?
Currently, no experiment has definitively confirmed string theory as the fundamental theory of nature. However, string theory has successfully passed numerous theoretical and mathematical tests over the last half-century.
Fundamental physics often requires patience and persistence. Albert Einstein predicted gravitational waves in 1915, but their detection by the LIGO experiment only occurred in 2015, a century later. Future experiments in particle physics, gravitational wave observatories, or cosmological measurements may provide definitive tests for string theory.
How many dimensions does string theory predict?
String theory proposes that spacetime has ten dimensions in total. However, we experience a four-dimensional world (three spatial and one temporal). Fortunately, this discrepancy isn’t insurmountable. String theory suggests that six of these dimensions are compactified, curled up into tiny shapes. These compactified dimensions would be undetectable except by extremely sensitive experiments, such as those conducted at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.
Delving Deeper: What String Theory Really Means
String theory provides a framework to reconcile forces typically observed on vast scales, like gravity, with the quantum realm of elementary particles such as electrons and protons.
According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, gravity is a force that warps spacetime around massive objects. It is one of the four fundamental forces in nature. Unlike electromagnetism, the strong force, and the weak force, gravity is remarkably weak at the particle level. Its effects become significant only at astronomical scales, influencing moons, planets, stars, and galaxies.
Furthermore, gravity does not appear to have a corresponding particle, a “graviton,” in the same way that electromagnetism has photons. Attempts to describe gravitons and their interactions mathematically lead to inconsistencies, such as infinite energies in tiny spaces. This breakdown in conventional particle physics calculations suggests an incomplete picture, as astrophysicist Paul Sutter has explained.
String theory offers a potential solution by eliminating the concept of point-like particles, including the problematic graviton. Strings, being extended one-dimensional objects, can interact and scatter in a way that avoids these infinities.
String theory’s mathematical consistency necessitates six additional spatial dimensions beyond our familiar three, bringing the total to ten spacetime dimensions. These extra dimensions are thought to be compactified, curled up at incredibly small scales, making them imperceptible to us. This is analogous to a powerline appearing one-dimensional to a distant bird but revealing its three-dimensional cylindrical nature to an ant crawling on it. As string theory expert Marika Taylor from the University of Southampton explains, “A one-dimensional object — that’s the thing that really tames the infinities that come up in the calculations.”
String theory fundamentally alters our perspective by replacing the diverse array of particles with a single fundamental entity: vibrating strings. Different vibrational modes of these strings manifest as different particles. A string vibrating at a particular frequency might exhibit the properties of a photon, while another string vibrating differently could behave as a quark.
Beyond addressing gravity, string theory initially attracted physicists with its potential to explain fundamental constants, such as the mass of the electron. The initial hope was that by accurately describing string dynamics, all other properties of the universe would naturally emerge.
However, this initial simplicity unveiled unexpected complexities. String theory’s mathematical framework doesn’t work in our familiar four dimensions. It requires a total of ten dimensions, with the extra six dimensions compactified and observable only at the string scale.
The Evolution of String Theory
String theory has undergone significant evolution since its inception. There is ongoing debate among researchers about whether it remains the most promising “theory of everything” or if alternative approaches should be prioritized.
John Schwarz noted that by the mid-1970s, there were compelling reasons to move away from string theory. The focus in physics shifted towards hadrons, subatomic particles composed of quarks, whose behavior seemed incompatible with string theory. Funding and interest in string theory dwindled significantly, with only a small group of dedicated researchers continuing its pursuit.
Throughout the following decade, these researchers developed five distinct versions of string theory. Intriguingly, they discovered unexpected connections between these seemingly separate theories. Edward Witten, at a pivotal string theory conference in 1995, proposed that these five theories were different perspectives of a single, more fundamental 11-dimensional theory, dubbed M-theory. This is similar to how Newtonian physics and Einstein’s relativity are approximations of each other in different regimes.
The “M” in M-theory is thought to stand for “membrane,” referring to higher-dimensional objects within the theory, but its exact meaning remains undefined – a placeholder for our incomplete understanding, as Marika Taylor describes it.
Finding the complete mathematical equations for M-theory that would hold true in all situations has proven challenging. However, the concept of a unifying underlying theory provided the impetus for theorists to develop mathematical tools for each of the five string theories and apply them to specific contexts where they were applicable.
Despite the strings’ undetectably small size with current technology, string theory achieved an early theoretical success in 1996 by providing a statistical description of black hole entropy.
Entropy, in thermodynamics, refers to the number of possible microscopic arrangements of a system. Black holes, by their nature, are impenetrable, making it impossible to directly observe their internal composition and arrangements. Nevertheless, in the early 1970s, Stephen Hawking and others used thermodynamics and quantum mechanics to calculate black hole entropy, suggesting an underlying internal structure. The nature of this structure remained a mystery.
String theory offered a compelling explanation: the entropy of a black hole could be accounted for by the different possible configurations of strings within it. “String theory has been able to give a spot-on counting,” Taylor notes, providing a potential explanation for the internal structure of black holes rather than just a qualitative idea.
However, string theory still faces significant challenges. It predicts an astronomically large number of ways to compactify the extra six dimensions. Each of these compactifications corresponds to a potentially different universe, and many seem compatible with the broad features of the Standard Model of particle physics, making it difficult to pinpoint the correct one. Furthermore, many of these models rely on supersymmetry, a symmetry between force and matter particles that has not been observed in experiments.
Adding to these challenges, it’s unclear whether string theory, including M-theory, can be reconciled with our current understanding of an expanding universe containing dark energy.
Critics, like Peter Woit of Columbia University, view these discrepancies as fundamental flaws. He argues that progress in string theory unification has not only been slow but has been “negative,” increasingly revealing why the approach may be fundamentally flawed.
Despite these criticisms, Marika Taylor maintains that current string theory models are likely oversimplified. She believes that features like cosmological expansion and the absence of supersymmetry might be incorporated into future, more refined versions of the theory. While gravitational-wave astronomy may offer new insights into quantum gravity, Taylor anticipates that further progress will primarily come from theoretical advancements within string theory itself. “I have a theoretical bias,” she admits, “but I think the kind of breakthrough I’m describing would come from a chalkboard; from thought.”
The Enduring Importance of String Theory
Regardless of whether string theory ultimately becomes the “theory of everything,” its impact as a productive research program is undeniable, particularly in mathematics.
“It can’t be a dead end in the sense of what we’ve learned just from mathematics itself,” Taylor emphasizes. “Even if the universe turns out to not be supersymmetric or ten-dimensional, string theory has already connected entire branches of mathematics.”
The discovery of dualities, connections between different string theories and mathematical frameworks, has been a major contribution. Dualities allow mathematicians to translate problems from one mathematical domain to another, enabling them to solve problems that were previously intractable. These dualities have found applications in areas as diverse as geometry, number theory, and quantum computing. While string theory might not directly lead to near-term technological advancements like a new iPhone, Taylor suggests its mathematical insights could pave the way for future technologies in the 22nd century.
Whether string theory’s ability to illuminate connections across mathematics is a sign of its ultimate validity or a fortunate coincidence remains a subject of debate. Edward Witten, while acknowledging reduced confidence in string theory becoming a complete physical theory, still believes it remains a fruitful area of research.
“To me, it’s implausible that humans stumbled by accident on such an incredible structure that sheds so much light on established physical theories, and also on so many different branches of mathematics,” Witten stated. “I have confidence that the general enterprise is on the right track, but I don’t claim that the argument I’ve given is scientifically convincing.”
Additional Resources
For deeper explorations of string theory’s history and current research, visit WhyStringTheory.com, a website designed for the general public by graduate students at Oxford and Cambridge. For a firsthand perspective, read this CERN Courier interview with string theory originator Gabriele Veneziano. For video explanations, watch “Why string theory is right” and “Why string theory is wrong” from PBS Digital Studios.
Bibliography
Join our Space Forums to discuss space and related topics. For news tips, corrections or comments, contact us at: [email protected].
Get the Space.com Newsletter
Stay updated on space news, rocket launches, skywatching events, and more!
Charlie Wood
Space.com Contributor
Charlie Wood is a science journalist covering physics and related topics for Space.com, LiveScience, Popular Science, Scientific American, Quanta Magazine, and other publications. He is based in New York and previously taught physics in Mozambique and science English in Japan. Follow him on Twitter @walkingthedot.
