You’ve likely encountered the viral meme: a charming image of a Virginia opossum paired with text urging appreciation for these creatures because of their supposed insatiable appetite for ticks. These memes, circulating widely online, often claim opossums devour thousands of ticks weekly or seasonally, painting them as nature’s tick control superheroes. The underlying message is clear: if ticks are your nemesis, then opossums should be your allies. However, the reality behind this popular sentiment is far more nuanced, and in many respects, simply untrue.
Unraveling the Opossum Diet: A Student’s Curiosity Sparks Investigation
This very question arose in a wildlife course at Eureka College, where a student, Kaitlyn Hild, inquired about the veracity of the tick-eating meme. Drawing on my experience handling numerous opossums during PhD research, I expressed skepticism and encouraged Hild to delve into the claim’s origins. Her subsequent investigation revealed the meme’s source: a scientific paper titled, Hosts as ecological traps for vectors of Lyme disease. Intrigued, we examined the paper, which paradoxically raised more questions than answers, leading us to embark on a research endeavor to uncover the truth about what Virginia opossums truly eat.
Our research plan began with securing a scientific collection permit from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, allowing us to collect road-killed opossums for stomach content analysis. After several seasons of roadside collection, yielding only 11 specimens, we sought a more efficient source. A local nuisance wildlife trapper proved invaluable, providing us with a freezer full of legally euthanized opossum carcasses. Each opossum was meticulously examined for ticks before dissection and stomach removal. Then began the detailed, and perhaps less glamorous, task: microscopic analysis of the stomach contents. Hild painstakingly sorted through 33 opossum stomachs, identifying every component (illustrated in the pie chart below). This hands-on investigation provided a crucial piece of the puzzle in understanding the opossum diet.
A Deep Dive into Opossum Dietary Habits: Literature Review and Stomach Analysis
Concurrently with our stomach analysis, a comprehensive review of existing scientific literature on opossum diets was undertaken. With the assistance of research librarians, we unearthed 23 published studies, dating back to John James Audubon’s observations in 1851. Later research, notably a detailed study by Bill Hamilton analyzing the diet of 186 opossums, mirrored our methodology, documenting the types and quantities of insects, plants, and vertebrates consumed. Collectively, these publications represented dietary analyses of over 1,280 opossums across their US range. Remarkably, not a single study documented the presence of ticks in opossum stomachs or any part of their digestive system.
Hild’s microscopic examination of stomach contents echoed these findings. Despite uncovering worms, a discarded French fry, fragments of glass, and even a partially digested shrew, ticks were conspicuously absent. She did identify three intact fleas (Figure 3), suggesting grooming behavior, but no ticks. This absence was unexpected. It seemed plausible that opossums might inadvertently ingest ticks while grooming fleas or consuming tick-infested prey. However, both our direct stomach analysis and the extensive literature review presented a consistent picture: ticks are not a significant component of the Virginia opossum diet.
Our findings, published in the International Journal of Ticks and Tick-Based Diseases, definitively concluded that ticks are not found in the stomachs of Virginia opossums, and there is no scientific evidence to support the claim that they are a dietary staple. This begs the question: where did the pervasive myth of the tick-eating opossum originate?
The Genesis of the Tick Myth: A Lab Experiment Misinterpreted
The source of the misinformation can be traced back to the very scientific paper that sparked our investigation. Researchers in New York state were studying the role of various vertebrates as hosts for blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis), the vector of Lyme disease. They captured four opossums and confined them in lab kennels, introducing 100 larval blacklegged ticks to each. Similar experiments were conducted with chipmunks, squirrels, mice, veeries, and catbirds. The animals were observed for four days, after which researchers counted the ticks that had detached after feeding.
In contrast to the kennels of other species, the opossum enclosures were notably lacking in detached ticks. The researchers, without further investigation like combing the opossums or examining stomach contents, concluded that the missing ticks must have been consumed by the opossums. This assumption, based on indirect evidence, gave rise to the myth of the tick-devouring marsupial.
Physiological Factors Overlooked: Why Opossums Aren’t Tick Vacuum Cleaners
This conclusion overlooked crucial physiological aspects of opossums. Opossums possess a lower metabolism compared to the other species tested, resulting in a lower body temperature and blood pressure. Research indicates that ticks feed more slowly on hosts with these characteristics. It is highly probable that after four days, the ticks were still attached to the opossums, slowly feeding. A simple combing of the opossums before release could have verified this, but this step was omitted. Furthermore, no examination of stomach contents or scat was conducted to confirm tick ingestion.
The exaggerated numbers of ticks attributed to opossum diets in memes stem from a flawed extrapolation in the original paper. On average, only 3.5 ticks detached from each opossum during the lab experiment, a mere 3% of the ticks introduced. However, other studies in New York State indicated that opossums can carry an average of 199 (±90) larval ticks during tick season. The researchers then extrapolated, suggesting that opossums must host over 5,500 larval ticks, theorizing that 97% are groomed off and eaten, leaving only 199 to be counted on wild animals. This led to the unsubstantiated claim that opossums consume 5,301 ticks per tick season. This “fuzzy math” lacks empirical evidence and significantly inflates the opossum’s role in tick control.
The fact that these claims passed peer review serves as a reminder of the importance of critical evaluation, even within scientific literature, especially when conclusions are as extraordinary as these.
Appreciating Opossums Beyond the Tick Myth: Their True Ecological Value
Ultimately, does the tick meme’s inaccuracy diminish the opossum’s value? Perhaps the positive attention, even if based on a myth, could foster tolerance for a species often perceived negatively. However, the danger lies in the misinformed practice of attracting opossums to residential areas with food, believing they will act as natural tick control. Providing food for opossums inevitably attracts a host of other wildlife, including raccoons, feral cats, rats, foxes, and coyotes.
This artificial feeding creates several problems. Firstly, it conditions wildlife to associate humans with food, a common precursor to aggressive behavior and subsequent removal of these animals. Secondly, it increases the risk of disease transmission among wildlife and to humans. Ironically, research intended to mitigate Lyme disease risk could inadvertently elevate the risk of other wildlife-borne diseases due to misguided attempts to attract opossums for tick control.
Opossums deserve appreciation for their intrinsic ecological roles, regardless of their tick consumption habits. They are vital scavengers, contributing to ecosystem health by cleaning up carrion. They play a role in seed dispersal and serve as prey for other species, contributing to the food web. As North America’s only native marsupial north of Mexico, they are unique and fascinating creatures. Their prehensile tails, while not designed for hanging upside down for extended periods, are used to carry nesting materials. Opossums are remarkable animals in their own right, and their ecological significance extends far beyond the exaggerated myth of the tick-eating superhero. They deserve our respect and appreciation for their true contributions to the environment.
Resources
(Links to original resources as in the original article would be listed here)
